ArticleJournal of the American College of Surgeons2025
Data Extraction and Curation from Radiology Reports for Pancreatic Cyst Surveillance Using Large Language Models.
Article in Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Large language models for analyzing contrast-enhanced ultrasound reports of pancreatic cystic lesions.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- How Often Do Large Language Models Agree with Each Other-And with the Truth? A Consensus- and Complexity-Stratified Analysis of Data Extraction for Neuroimaging AI.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Open-source large language model-based on-premises pipeline for automated data extraction from unstructured electronic health records: a pilot study.BMJ health & care informatics · 2026Article
- Evaluating Large Language Models for Automated Evidence Synthesis in Neuroimaging AI: A Multi-Model Benchmark.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundManual curation of radiographic features in pancreatic cyst registries for data abstraction and longitudinal evaluation is time-consuming and limits widespread implementation. We examined the feasibility and accuracy of using large language models (LLMs) to extract clinical variables from radiology reports. STUDY
designA single-center retrospective study included patients under surveillance for pancreatic cysts. Nine radiographic elements used to monitor cyst progression were included: cyst size, main pancreatic duct (MPD) size (continuous variable), number of lesions, MPD dilation 5 mmol/L or more (categorical), branch duct dilation, presence of solid component, calcific lesion, pancreatic atrophy, and pancreatitis. LLMs (generative pretrained transformer [GPT]) on the OpenAI GPT-4 platform were used to extract elements of interest with a zero-shot learning approach using prompting to facilitate annotation without any training data. A manually annotated institutional cyst database was used as the ground truth for comparison.
resultsOverall, 3,198 longitudinal scans from 991 patients were included. GPT successfully extracted the selected radiographic elements with high accuracy. Among categorical variables, accuracy ranged from 97% for solid component to 99% for calcific lesions. In the continuous variables, accuracy varied from 92% for cyst size to 97% for MPD size. However, Cohen's kappa was higher for cyst size (0.92) compared with that for MPD size (0.82). Lowest accuracy (81%) was noted in the multiclass variable for a number of cysts.
conclusionsLLM can accurately extract and curate data from radiology reports for pancreatic cyst surveillance and can be reliably used to assemble longitudinal databases. Future application of this work can potentiate the development of artificial intelligence-based surveillance models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.