Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40637294›Full record

ArticleJournal of advanced nursing2026

Why Do Nurses Carry Out Illegitimate Tasks? A Qualitative Study Through the Lens of Gender Theory and Nursing History.

Lena Nyholm, Eva Jangland, Katarina Edfeldt, Anna-Karin Gunnarsson, Camilla Fröjd, Anna Hauffman, Therese Avallin, Elin Björck

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of advanced nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Lena NyholmDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Nursing Research, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0085-7963
Eva JanglandDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Nursing Research, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6888-3792
Katarina EdfeldtDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Nursing Research, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7366-6258
Anna-Karin GunnarssonDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Nursing Research, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-3152-1204
Camilla FröjdDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Nursing Research, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3993-5236
Anna HauffmanDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Nursing Research, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3845-6209
Therese AvallinDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Nursing Research, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9222-7736
Elin BjörckDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Nursing Research, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo identify illegitimate tasks performed by registered nurses (RNs) in surgical care and explore why they perform them through the lens of gender theory and nursing history.

designA qualitative study guided by gender theory, nursing history and the Fundamentals of Care framework.

methodsRNs (n = 48) at three surgical wards attended a lecture on gender theory and a lecture on nursing history, each followed by focus group interviews (n = 12) with 6-8 participants. The analysis included two steps: (A) a content analysis of the interviews to identify illegitimate tasks and (B) a gender analysis using Connell's framework and nursing history.

resultsThe RNs describe their work situation in clinical practice as fragmented by illegitimate tasks. The results show how this can be explained as induced by gender theory and nursing history, with the main theme RNs support overall patient care and work climate at the cost of nursing care-a behaviour explained by gender theory and nursing history, presented in four categories: (1) performing administrative tasks and information processing outside the nursing profession, (2) maintaining a pleasant workplace, (3) being constantly available, facilitating and compensating for physicians and (4) backing up nursing assistants.

conclusionContemporary RNs frequently utilise their resources to carry out a wide range of illegitimate tasks. The findings illustrate that RNs remain influenced by their history and still integrate traditionally female-associated tasks and behaviours into the workplace, often without conscious awareness. This knowledge can be used to understand why RNs perform illegitimate tasks without being asked to do so. Primarily, managers and also RNs must consider their complex situation from this perspective to implement systematic organisational changes that ensure patients receive the nursing care they need. IMPACT: There is a global shortage of registered nurses (RNs). Patients suffer from missed nursing care. RNs describe their work as fragmented, with frequent interruptions and illegitimate tasks they feel expected to prioritise, even if not prompted by routines or requests. RNs are influenced by nursing history, integrating traditionally female-associated tasks and behaviours into the workplace, often subconsciously. When nurse managers and RNs become aware of these problems, it can pave the way for change, which can free up nursing resources and improve patient care. By becoming aware of what constitutes illegitimate tasks and understanding why nurses perform them, organisational changes can be made to fully utilise RNs' competencies. The findings point to a systemic issue that calls for strategic leadership from managers to drive substantive change.

Indexed as

History of NursingNursing Staff, HospitalAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchWorkplacegender theoryillegitimate tasksmissed nursing carenurse rolesnursing historysurgical nursing

Identifiers

PMID40637294
PMCPMC12994667

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.