ReviewScandinavian journal of caring sciences2025
How Woman-Centred Care Is Experienced and Understood in Maternity Services by Women and Professionals: A Rapid Review.
Review in Scandinavian journal of caring sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Identifying Strategies for Implementing Woman-Centered Care in Iranian Maternity Services: A Modified Delphi Study.International journal of women's health · 2026Article
- How Woman-Centred Care Is Experienced and Understood in Maternity Services by Women and Professionals: A Rapid Review.Scandinavian journal of caring sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWoman/person-centred care is a key policy objective for maternity services in many high-income countries, both strategically and in terms of service delivery. This approach to care prioritises the individual woman's needs and aspirations over those of professionals or institutions. However, the concept remains ambiguous and practical implementation guidelines are lacking, leading to concerns that it is being practised tokenistically.
aimTo explore how woman-centred care in maternity services in high-income countries is experienced and understood by women and professionals.
methodsA rapid review was conducted to synthesise evidence on woman-centred care from women's and clinicians' perspectives. Five bibliographic databases, CINAHL, Maternity and Infant Care, MEDLINE, PsycINFO and Web of Science, were searched systematically in December 2023. Citations eligible for inclusion were peer-reviewed quantitative, qualitative and mixed-methods empirical studies conducted in high-income countries and literature reviews reporting on studies conducted in high-income countries. Title and abstract screening, full-text screening, data extraction and quality appraisal were performed, with 10% of records double-screened to ensure consistency and minimise bias. Methodological quality was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. Extracted data were synthesised thematically.
findingsIn total, 5295 records were retrieved; after deduplication, 2707 records were screened, and 24 studies met the inclusion criteria. The review identified inconsistencies in how woman-centred care was experienced and understood at all levels of service provision, from policy directives to institutional practices. Diverse understandings of woman-centred care among stakeholders were found to influence interactions. Several studies revealed that professionals' varying interpretations affected their attitudes and approaches to care, while some women were found to hold differing expectations about woman-centred care provision.
conclusionTo realise the policy intention of woman-centred care, further context-specific investigations are needed to provide evidence and evaluation to inform implementation strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.