Trial reportNeurorehabilitation and neural repair2025
Feasibility and Sensitivity of Wearable Sensors for Daily Activity Monitoring in Spinal Cord Injury Trials.
Trial report in Neurorehabilitation and neural repair, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03935321 (Antibodies Against Nogo-A to Enhance Plasticity, Regeneration and Functional Recovery After Spinal Cord Injury - A Multicenter International Randomized Double Blind Placebo Controlled Phase II Clinical Proof of Concept Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Antibodies Against Nogo-A to Enhance Plasticity, Regeneration and Functional Recovery After Spinal Cord Injury - A Multicenter International Randomized Double Blind Placebo Controlled Phase II Clinical Proof of Concept Trial
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Rebuilding spinal circuit function after spinal cord injury through a patient-specific interneuron precision model.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Article
- Digital biomarkers derived from wearable sensors in neurorehabilitation: a scoping review.Frontiers in neurology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BackgroundThe aim of clinical trials for spinal cord injury (SCI) is to improve everyday-life activity outcomes, which requires reliable methods for monitoring patient activity. This study evaluates sensor-derived activity metrics in comparison to established clinical assessment methods.MethodsWearable inertial sensors collected data from 69 individuals with acute, traumatic cervical SCI participating in the Nogo-A Inhibition in Spinal Cord Injury trial (NCT03935321), a phase 2b, multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. During inpatient rehabilitation, participants wore up to 5 inertial sensors for up to 3 consecutive days each week. An estimation of average daily energy expenditure (EE) was used as an indicator of physical activity and compared to the recovery of Upper Extremity Motor Scores (UEMS) and Spinal Cord Independence Measures (SCIM).ResultsParticipants in the
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.