Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40637171›Full record

ArticleMedical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making2025

Population Preferences for Treatment in Life-Limiting Illness: Valuing the Way Time Is Spent at the End of Life.

Patricia Kenny, Deborah J Street, Jane Hall

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Patricia KennyUniversity of Technology Sydney (Centre for Health Economics Research & Evaluation [CHERE]), Sydney, Australia.
Deborah J StreetUniversity of Technology Sydney (Centre for Health Economics Research & Evaluation [CHERE]), Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4476-0656
Jane HallUniversity of Technology Sydney (Centre for Health Economics Research & Evaluation [CHERE]), Sydney, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

IntroductionSocietal preferences over different health states are used to guide service planning, but there has been little investigation of treatment preferences at the end of life. This study aimed to examine population preferences for active treatment or palliation for cancer patients when life expectancy is limited and the relative importance of time spent in hospital or with functional limitation.MethodsWe used a discrete choice experiment that presented respondents with a series of hypothetical patients who had died, describing their last few months of life. Respondents selected the end-of-life alternative they thought best. Data were collected from 1,502 Australian adults participating in an online survey panel. Latent class analysis was used to identify groups with different preference patterns.ResultsFour preference groups were identified along with an additional group that we termed

Indexed as

Palliative CarePatient PreferenceTerminal CareAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAustraliaFemaleHumansLife ExpectancyMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsSurveys and QuestionnairesTime Factorscommunity preferencesDiscrete choice experimentpalliative care

Identifiers

PMID40637171
PMCPMC12413504

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.