Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40637133›Full record

Trial reportThe British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science2025

The efficacy of adjunctive

Olivia M Dean, Susan M Cotton, Melanie M Ashton, Alyna Turner, Lucy Saunders, Chee H Ng, Malcolm Hopwood, Seetal Dodd, Jon-Paul Khoo, Adam J Walker and 13 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in The British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors.

Olivia M DeanIMPACT Strategic Research Centre, School of Medicine, Deakin University, Barwon Health, Geelong, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2776-3935
Susan M CottonOrygen Ltd, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health, Parkville, Australia.
Melanie M AshtonIMPACT Strategic Research Centre, School of Medicine, Deakin University, Barwon Health, Geelong, Australia.
Alyna TurnerIMPACT Strategic Research Centre, School of Medicine, Deakin University, Barwon Health, Geelong, Australia.
Lucy SaundersIMPACT Strategic Research Centre, School of Medicine, Deakin University, Barwon Health, Geelong, Australia.
Chee H NgSchool of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Australia.
Malcolm HopwoodDepartment of Psychiatry University of Melbourne, Albert Road Clinic, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6004-4521
Seetal DoddIMPACT Strategic Research Centre, School of Medicine, Deakin University, Barwon Health, Geelong, Australia.
Jon-Paul KhooIMPACT Strategic Research Centre, School of Medicine, Deakin University, Barwon Health, Geelong, Australia.
Adam J WalkerIMPACT Strategic Research Centre, School of Medicine, Deakin University, Barwon Health, Geelong, Australia.
Mary Lou ChattertonDeakin University, Institute for Health Transformation, Geelong, Australia.
Bianca E KavanaghDeakin Rural Health, School of Medicine, Deakin University, Warrnambool, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1656-2775
Sarah E NadjidaiDepartment of Psychiatry University of Melbourne, The Melbourne Clinic, Professorial Unit, Richmond, Australia.
Samantha L Lo MonacoIMPACT Strategic Research Centre, School of Medicine, Deakin University, Barwon Health, Geelong, Australia.
Brian H HarveyIMPACT Strategic Research Centre, School of Medicine, Deakin University, Barwon Health, Geelong, Australia.
Gin S MalhiDiscipline of Psychiatry, Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4524-9091
Ellie BrownOrygen Ltd, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health, Parkville, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1645-5443
David R SkvarcIMPACT Strategic Research Centre, School of Medicine, Deakin University, Barwon Health, Geelong, Australia.
Danica DiaoIMPACT Strategic Research Centre, School of Medicine, Deakin University, Barwon Health, Geelong, Australia.
Felice N JackaIMPACT Strategic Research Centre, School of Medicine, Deakin University, Barwon Health, Geelong, Australia.
Jerome SarrisFlorey Institute for Neuroscience and Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.
Nathan L DowlingDepartment of Psychiatry University of Melbourne, The Melbourne Clinic, Professorial Unit, Richmond, Australia.
Michael BerkIMPACT Strategic Research Centre, School of Medicine, Deakin University, Barwon Health, Geelong, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5554-6946

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBipolar depression remains difficult to treat, and people often experience ongoing residual symptoms, decreased functioning and impaired quality of life. Adjunctive therapies targeting novel pathways can provide wider treatment options and improve clinical outcomes.

aimsThe current 28-week randomised, multisite, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial investigated mangosteen pericarp extract as an adjunct to treatment-as-usual for treatment of bipolar depression.

methodThis trial was prospectively registered on the Australia New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (no. ACTRN12616000028404). Participants aged 18 years and older with a diagnosis of bipolar I or II and with at least moderate depressive symptoms were eligible for the study. A total of 1016 participants were initially approached or volunteered for the study, of whom 712 did not progress to screening, with an additional 152 screened out. Seventy participants were randomly allocated to mangosteen and 82 to a placebo control. Fifty participants in the mangosteen and 64 participants in the placebo condition completed the treatment period and were analysed.

resultsResults indicated limited support for the primary hypothesis of superior depression symptom reduction following 24 weeks of treatment. Although overall changes in depressive symptoms did not substantially differ between conditions over the course of the trial, we observed significantly greater improvements for the mangosteen condition at 24 weeks, compared with baseline, for mood symptoms, clinical impressions of bipolar severity and social functioning compared with controls. These differences were attenuated at week 28 post-discontinuation assessment.

conclusionsAdjunctive mangosteen pericarp treatment appeared to have limited efficacy in mood and functional symptoms associated with bipolar disorder, but not with manic symptoms or quality of life, suggesting a novel therapeutic approach that should be verified by replication.

Indexed as

Bipolar DisorderGarcinia mangostanaPhytotherapyPlant ExtractsAdultDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultPlant Extractsbipolar disorderclinical trialdepressionGarcinia mangostanamangosteen pericarp extract

Identifiers

PMID40637133
PMCPMC12628125

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.