ArticleInternational journal of cosmetic science2025
The variability of in vivo sunscreen sun protection factor values.
Article in International journal of cosmetic science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- A proposal for simplifying the labelling of sunscreens.International journal of cosmetic science · 2026Article
- What's New in Photoprotection?American journal of clinical dermatology · 2026Review
- Natural photoprotection under scrutiny: an in vitro evaluation.Photochemical & photobiological sciences : Official journal of the European Photochemistry Association and the European Society for Photobiology · 2026Article
- The variability of in vivo sunscreen sun protection factor values.International journal of cosmetic science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveDetermination of the sunburn protection provided by a sunscreen product is required globally for sales of these products. Over the past 80 years, many aspects of determining the protection 'factor' have evolved and been modified, with varying levels of impact on the sunburn protection factor (SPF) value. In order to compare new non-invasive and in vitro methods against traditional SPF test protocols, a large, multi-center clinical trial was conducted to establish the level of equivalence of these new methods with the current codified testing standard ISO24444 ([1]: Cosmetics - sun protection methods - in vivo determination of the sun protection factor (SPF), 2019). This report reports the variability found in the in vivo determination of SPF values.
methodsThirty-two products of varying levels of sunburn and UVA protection, in a variety of formulation vehicles and ultraviolet (UV) filter combinations and concentrations, were coded and sent to pre-qualified in vivo SPF testing laboratories. The products were divided into eight product groups (four products per product group). For each product group, samples were sent to four laboratories (across product groups, a total of 12 laboratories participated). Precision and trueness estimates were calculated separately for each product group. 'Expected' SPF values were not provided to the test laboratories. However, laboratories were informed as to whether the 'true' SPF was less than or greater than 25.
resultsInterlaboratory variability for samples was proportional to the SPF of the products, with high SPF products having higher variability. Intra-laboratory variability (repeatability) was much lower than the interlaboratory variability.
conclusionsThis study highlights the fact that the interlaboratory variability of SPF results is considerable and is likely greater than expected by the public and regulatory bodies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.