ArticleNMR in biomedicine2025
Investigations of Anti-Reflux Formulations Containing Alginates Using MRI: A Feasibility Study Using Conventional 3.0T and 0.5T Open Upright Scanning.
Article in NMR in biomedicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- NMR/MRI Techniques to Characterize Alginate-Based Gel Rafts for the Treatment of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Investigations of Anti-Reflux Formulations Containing Alginates Using MRI: A Feasibility Study Using Conventional 3.0T and 0.5T Open Upright Scanning.NMR in biomedicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Sodium alginates are widely used for their gelling, thickening, and stabilizing properties. Raft-producing formulations have been used widely for many years to treat the symptoms of anti-reflux disease and those suffering occasional symptoms. The aim of this study was to determine the feasibility of characterizing rafts formed from alginate-containing anti-reflux formulations in vivo using either a supine high-field 3T scanner or an upright low-field 0.5T MRI scanner. Six healthy participants (one male, five female, age range 23-50 years) attended three study visits following an overnight fast and were scanned at one field strength (N = 3 at 0.5T, N = 3 at 3T) before and after ingestion of an acidic drink followed by one of three different alginate antireflux formulations. These formulations had identical quantities (by mass) of sodium alginate, calcium carbonate, and sodium bicarbonate. Raft position and volume were measured along with gastric contents and gas using T2-weighted MRI. Additionally, the image textures of the raft and T2 properties were investigated at 3T. In vitro properties (raft strength, mass, and NMR chemical analysis) of the three different formulations were also determined. Alginate rafts were generated in all volunteers for all formulations. Gastric emptying of the acidic drink was consistent across all study days. Raft volumes measured showed some differences between body positions, with upright maintaining a higher volume of raft for longer. In vitro analysis showed significant differences in strength and mass between two of the formulations, which were likely caused by differences in the chemical structure of the alginates used in the formulations. In conclusion, characterization of anti-reflux alginate raft properties can be achieved using both low-field upright and high-field supine MRI. Larger scale studies are needed to determine the differences between formulations in vivo.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.