Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40636996›Full record

ReviewJournal of microscopy2025

An overview of reliable and representative DVC measurements for musculoskeletal tissues.

Gianluca Tozzi, Enrico Dall'Ara

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of microscopy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Gianluca TozziCentre for Advanced Manufacturing and Materials, School of Engineering, University of Greenwich, London, UK.
Enrico Dall'AraDivision of Clinical Medicine, Mellanby Centre for Musculoskeletal Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.

Funding

EPSRC EP/Z000203/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Musculoskeletal tissues present complex hierarchical structures and mechanical heterogeneity across multiple length scales, making them difficult to characterise accurately. Digital volume correlation (DVC) is a non-destructive imaging technique that enables quantification of internal 3D strain fields under realistic loading conditions, offering a unique tool to investigate the biomechanics of biological tissues and biomaterials. This review highlights recent advancements in DVC, focusing on its applications across scales ranging from organ- to tissue-level mechanics in both mineralised and soft tissues. Instead of a traditional systematic review, we identify key technical challenges including the treatment of tissue interfaces, border effects, and the quantification of uncertainty in DVC outputs. Strategies for improving measurement accuracy and reliability are discussed. We also report on the increasing use of DVC in in vivo applications, its coupling with computational modelling to inform and validate biomechanical simulations, and its recent integration with data-driven methods such as deep learning to directly predict displacement and strain fields. Additionally, we examine its application in tissue engineering and implant-tissue interface assessment. By addressing such areas, we outline current limitations and emerging opportunities for future research. These include advancing precision, enabling clinical translation, and leveraging machine learning to create more robust, automated, and predictive DVC workflows for musculoskeletal health and tissue engineering.

Indexed as

Imaging, Three-DimensionalMusculoskeletal SystemAnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaComputer SimulationDeep LearningFinite Element AnalysisHumansTissue EngineeringTomography, X-Ray ComputedX-Ray Microtomographybiomaterialsdigital volume correlationin situ mechanicsmusculoskeletal tissues

Identifiers

PMID40636996
PMCPMC12459401

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.