ArticleHypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979)2025
Pulse Pressure Impairs Cognition via White Matter Disruption.
Article in Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- A peripheral perspective on brain health: vascular and skeletal muscle contributions.American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology · 2026Review
- Cerebral amyloid associated with global cognition is differentially moderated by pulse pressure across education levels in The 90+ Study.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026Article
- Vascular stiffness predicts plasma markers of neurodegeneration among older African Americans.The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease · 2026Observational
- Fifteen years on: a review of the Cam-CAN study of the cognitive neuroscience of ageing.GeroScience · 2026Review
- Complementary MR measures of white matter and their relation to cardiovascular health and cognition.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn older adults, elevated pulse pressure predicts cognitive decline, independent of overall blood pressure. It is proposed to compromise cerebrovascular integrity, potentially leading to brain damage, though the underlying mechanisms remain unclear. We hypothesized that pulse pressure affects cognition by disrupting white matter microstructure, and that it does so independently of other cardiovascular risk factors.
methodsLatent indices of pulse pressure, overall blood pressure, and heart rate variability were estimated in a cross-sectional, population-based cohort (n=708, aged 18-88 years). An indicator of white matter microstructure was derived from diffusion-weighted imaging, termed the peak width of skeletonized mean diffusivity (PSMD). Cognitive function was assessed using measures of processing speed.
resultsIn robust regression, pulse pressure was significantly associated with PSMD, with PSMD also being associated with processing speed. Thus, higher pulse pressure was associated with greater white matter disruption, which in turn was associated with slower processing. This motivated testing whether PSMD mediates the effects of pulse pressure on processing speed using structural equation models. PSMD mediated this effect, accounting for 72% of the effect after adjusting for age, and remained significant after adjusting for other cardiovascular factors. We then expanded the model to show that vascular-related changes in processing speed also drive changes in higher cognitive functions.
conclusionsHigh pulse pressure disrupts the microstructural integrity of white matter in the brain, leading to slower processing speed. We propose that better management of pulse pressure could help to preserve white matter integrity and reduce cognitive decline in later life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.