ArticleFrontiers in sports and active living2025
Assessment of functional movement screen and performance parameters of wrestlers using inertial sensors.
Article in Frontiers in sports and active living, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A functional movement screen (FMS) is an assessment system that identifies athletes' movement profiles and injury risks. This is also used to determine sport-specific performance and training effectiveness. However, none of the studies have employed the IMU measurement system to assess FMS and performance parameters in wrestling. In this study, we aimed to assess FMS and kinematic parameters in wrestlers using IMU sensors to explore the relationship between FMS scores, range of motion (ROM), and performance parameters. Ten healthy controls and ten wrestlers completed the seven tasks of the FMS and performed wrestling techniques. The screening results were assessed, revealing significant differences in shoulder mobility (Control: 2.7 ± 0.6, Wrestlers: 1.9 ± 0.8) (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.