ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
Identifying emphysema risk using brominated flame retardants exposure: a machine learning predictive model based on the SHAP methodology.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- An Exploration of Machine Learning Methods in Human Biomonitoring.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026Review
- Association between total dietary sugar intake and gallstones in Americans.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Development of an explainable machine learning asthma prediction model using serum brominated flame retardants in a national population.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Emphysema is a major contributor to lung disease progression and is associated with significant health risks, including exacerbations, mortality, and lung cancer. While environmental exposures, such as brominated flame retardants (BFRs), have been suggested as risk factors, their role in emphysema prediction has been largely overlooked. This study aimed to develop a machine learning (ML) model to predict emphysema risk incorporating BFRs exposure data and demographic characteristics. Methods: Using data from the NHANES (2005-2016) dataset, 8,205 participants were included in the study. The participants were divided into a training set (70%) and a testing set (30%). Eight machine learning algorithms, including lightGBM, MLP, DT, KNN, RF, SVM, Enet, and XGBoost, were applied to build and evaluate the model. Demographic data and BFRs exposure levels were used as predictors. SHAP and Partial Dependence Plots (PDP) were used for model interpretability analysis. Results: The MLP model showed the best performance with an AUC of 0.83. Age and PBB153 were identified as the most influential predictors. SHAP analysis revealed that higher exposure to BFRs, particularly PBB153, was strongly associated with increased emphysema risk. The WQS model further confirmed the positive relationship between BFRs exposure and emphysema. Conclusion: This study demonstrates the significant predictive value of BFR exposure in emphysema risk assessment and highlights the importance of incorporating environmental factors into disease prediction models. The findings provide new insights for integrating BFRs into personalized health risk assessments and public health interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.