ReviewFrontiers in public health2025
A review of the business case for workforce nutrition initiatives.
Review in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Undernutrition and malnutrition remain persistent challenges in low-and middle-income countries (LMICs), especially among workers in labour-intensive sectors. Workplace nutrition programmes (WNPs) have shown promising health benefits, but evidence on their business impact remains scarce-particularly in LMIC contexts. This review examines whether WNPs generate measurable business outcomes that could incentivise employer investment. Using a structured literature review (SLR) approach, we systematically analysed 24 relevant studies-10 systematic reviews and 14 empirical papers. Search terms targeted nutrition-related workplace interventions and business outcomes, including productivity, absenteeism, and return on investment. Searches were conducted across Scopus, ScienceDirect, Google Scholar, and grey literature sources. Studies were included if they assessed business-related outcomes of health or wellness interventions with nutrition components. Only four studies were based in LMICs; the remaining 20 were from high-income countries (HICs), underscoring a major evidence gap. Despite this, two main impact pathways emerged: (1) healthier diets improve workers' concentration and energy, reducing absenteeism and saving costs; and (2) improved nutrition enhances motivation, productivity, and work quality, which may increase sales and revenue. The first pathway is more relevant to skilled workers who are harder to replace, unlike the easily replaceable labour force common in many LMIC industries. In the second pathway, while improved nutrition may boost productivity, structural barriers-such as limited bargaining power in global supply chains-can prevent these gains from leading to better pay for workers. This review outlines key pathways through which improved worker nutrition may benefit businesses and identifies critical gaps in the evidence. It also proposes outcome indicators relevant to private sector stakeholders in LMICs, helping to guide future empirical research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.