ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2025
Clinical training in veterinary medicine: perspectives on quality and the role of specialists.
Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Factors Associated with Veterinary Professionals' Intent to Intervene in Cases of Animal Maltreatment.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Student Perceptions of Preparation and Competency Development During Extramural Clinical Rotations in Germany: An Online Survey.Veterinary sciences · 2026Article
- Evaluation of Knowledge, Self-Assessment of Skills and Self-Perception in the Role of Small Animal Practitioner of Veterinary Students Before and After a Structured Clinical Rotation.Veterinary sciences · 2026Article
- Perceptions of dogs and animal-assisted support programs among veterinary students and teaching staff in Romania.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The practical year represents the transition between studies and professional work for students and is therefore a significant phase of clinical undergraduate training in Germany. Veterinary educational establishments are obliged to obtain information on elective practical training in order to assess the quality of clinical training. Since the constant increase in knowledge makes it necessary in many cases for veterinarians to specialize as part of postgraduate training, the influence of these specializations on clinical training of undergraduates should be investigated using a mixed-method design. An online survey was created for students and veterinarians as part of the quantitative data collection. Qualitative data collection was carried out in the form of guided interviews using a mixed-method design, with questions based on preliminary, selected results from the questionnaires. The majority of students surveyed were satisfied with the quality of training and supervision during their practical year (73%). The specialization of veterinarians was rated as "(very) important" by 52% for choosing a work placement for practical training. Around 40% of students felt that they received different levels of supervision from veterinarians with different qualifications. The veterinarians rated theoretical knowledge, communication skills and commitment of the students predominantly positively, but noted a deficit in practical skills. The specialization of veterinarians has an influence on theoretical education within the clinical training. The quality of training generally depends on the veterinarians' level of knowledge and professional experience. The practical year gives students the opportunity to improve their practical skills before entering the profession, however for better outcomes and increased satisfaction, the objectives for elective practical training should be defined in advance between the practical training provider and the student.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.