Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40636790›Full record

ArticleAustralasian journal of ultrasound in medicine2025

The PEARLS Program: Point-of-Care Ultrasound for Emergency and Acute Care in Resource-Limited Settings.

Bilal Hafeez, Wai Chung Tse, Ivan Chan, Vincent Atua, Ignatius Junior Bolokon, Alu Kali, Sam Orde, Jo McCann, Jonathan Henry, Lewis McLean

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Australasian journal of ultrasound in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Bilal HafeezFaculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences The University of Melbourne Melbourne Victoria Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-7037-1075
Wai Chung TseAustin Health Melbourne Victoria Australia.
Ivan ChanAustin Health Melbourne Victoria Australia.
Vincent AtuaEmergency Department Vila Central Hospital Port Vila Vanuatu.
Ignatius Junior BolokonEmergency Department Rabaul Provincial Hospital Rabaul Papua New Guinea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9626-6174
Alu KaliIntensive Care Unit, Department of Anaesthesia & Intensive Care Port Moresby General Hospital Papua New Guinea.
Sam OrdeDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine Nepean Hospital Sydney New South Wales Australia.
Jo McCannDepartment of General Practice and Rural Health Otago Medical School Dunedin New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4900-6844
Jonathan HenryEmergency Department Peninsula Health Melbourne Victoria Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7140-529X
Lewis McLeanDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine Nepean Hospital Sydney New South Wales Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4866-8678

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) can be very useful in low-resource settings, where access to radiology is often limited. The PEARLS (POCUS in Emergency and Acute care in Resource-Limited Settings) program is a scalable, innovative approach to POCUS training for clinicians in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), where access to imaging modalities is frequently limited. Methods: A review of the PEARLS program was conducted using participant data that were gathered from participants in Vanuatu, Tonga, and Papua New Guinea (PNG), tracking the number and type of scans uploaded and overall engagement with the training. The PEARLS program begins with a three-day in-person course focused on hands-on practice using portable ultrasound devices. Clinicians are provided with devices and guided on how to store images securely online. After the course, each participant is paired with an experienced coach who offers ongoing remote support through regular image reviews and a series of follow-up lectures. One year later, the program team revisits the site, and selected participants are transitioned into faculty roles to help train others in a train-the-trainer model. Results: Across 40 participants, a total of 576 scans were uploaded following training. The extended FAST exam was the predominant modality, followed by critical care echocardiography and first-trimester pregnancy assessments. Although remote mentoring maintained high levels of engagement, only one participant achieved the full competency benchmark of 25 uploaded scans. Discussion: These findings illustrate that a longitudinal training model with remote mentorship can improve POCUS proficiency in LMIC settings. However, challenges such as inconsistent internet access and equipment sharing persist, potentially limiting sustained competency. Conclusion: The PEARLS program presents a scalable, sustainable framework for POCUS education in resource-limited environments, fostering local expertise and enhancing acute care diagnostics.

Indexed as

EFASTFELSPOCUS for Emergency and Acute care in Resource‐Limited Settingspoint‐of‐care ultrasoundremote image review

Identifiers

PMID40636790
PMCPMC12234769

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.