ArticleAustralasian journal of ultrasound in medicine2025
The PEARLS Program: Point-of-Care Ultrasound for Emergency and Acute Care in Resource-Limited Settings.
Article in Australasian journal of ultrasound in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The PEARLS Program: Point-of-Care Ultrasound for Emergency and Acute Care in Resource-Limited Settings.Australasian journal of ultrasound in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) can be very useful in low-resource settings, where access to radiology is often limited. The PEARLS (POCUS in Emergency and Acute care in Resource-Limited Settings) program is a scalable, innovative approach to POCUS training for clinicians in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), where access to imaging modalities is frequently limited. Methods: A review of the PEARLS program was conducted using participant data that were gathered from participants in Vanuatu, Tonga, and Papua New Guinea (PNG), tracking the number and type of scans uploaded and overall engagement with the training. The PEARLS program begins with a three-day in-person course focused on hands-on practice using portable ultrasound devices. Clinicians are provided with devices and guided on how to store images securely online. After the course, each participant is paired with an experienced coach who offers ongoing remote support through regular image reviews and a series of follow-up lectures. One year later, the program team revisits the site, and selected participants are transitioned into faculty roles to help train others in a train-the-trainer model. Results: Across 40 participants, a total of 576 scans were uploaded following training. The extended FAST exam was the predominant modality, followed by critical care echocardiography and first-trimester pregnancy assessments. Although remote mentoring maintained high levels of engagement, only one participant achieved the full competency benchmark of 25 uploaded scans. Discussion: These findings illustrate that a longitudinal training model with remote mentorship can improve POCUS proficiency in LMIC settings. However, challenges such as inconsistent internet access and equipment sharing persist, potentially limiting sustained competency. Conclusion: The PEARLS program presents a scalable, sustainable framework for POCUS education in resource-limited environments, fostering local expertise and enhancing acute care diagnostics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.