Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40636776›Full record

ArticleJournal of arrhythmia2025

A study of the clinical usefulness of the eMEMO®.

Hinako Nakayama, Nobuhisa Watanabe, Misa Tsukamoto, Miyu Mori, Eri Nakakubo, Shogo Watanabe, Manabu Taniguchi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of arrhythmia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Hinako NakayamaDepartment of Medical Technology Graduate School of Health Sciences, Okayama University Okayama Japan.
Nobuhisa WatanabeDepartment of Medical Technology Graduate School of Health Sciences, Okayama University Okayama Japan.
Misa TsukamotoTaniguchi Heart Clinic Fukuyama Japan.
Miyu MoriTaniguchi Heart Clinic Fukuyama Japan.
Eri NakakuboTaniguchi Heart Clinic Fukuyama Japan.
Shogo WatanabeFaculty of Health Science, Okayama University Okayama Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1700-2892
Manabu TaniguchiTaniguchi Heart Clinic Fukuyama Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Taking advantage of the characteristics of the novel compact external loop recorder (ELR; eMEMO®), which is waterproof and has an automatic arrhythmia detection and monitoring function for up to 14 days, we investigated the usefulness of ELR measurement, especially during bathing. Methods: We included 294 patients (102 males and 192 females) who presented with palpitations as their main complaint from April 2021 to September 2022, with a mean age of 57.0 ± 17.4 years. The average wearing period of the ELR was 4.5 ± 0.9 days. Results: ELR for longer than 24 h led to the first arrhythmia detection in 170 (21.3%) of the 799 cases of all detected arrhythmias, including 11 with premature atrial contraction, 50 with premature ventricular contraction, 8 with atrial fibrillation, 32 with supraventricular tachycardia, and 21 with sick sinus syndrome. They had low noise contamination during measurement. Arrhythmic events during bathing were observed in 52 patients, effectively detecting arrhythmia during bathing, which was difficult with the usual 24-h Holter electrocardiography (ECG). In addition, the itching and rash of the skin at the electrode attachment over a period of up to 5 days were very mild, indicating the comfort of the waterproof patch-type electrode. Conclusions: The patch-type ELR (eMEMO®) with waterproof design is capable of continuous recording regardless of restrictions such as bathing or exercise and is useful for detecting stable arrhythmias in patients with palpitations.

Indexed as

arrhythmiaatrial fibrillationECGexternal loop recorderskin condition

Identifiers

PMID40636776
PMCPMC12238776

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.