ArticleJournal of arrhythmia2025
A study of the clinical usefulness of the eMEMO®.
Article in Journal of arrhythmia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A study of the clinical usefulness of the eMEMO®.Journal of arrhythmia · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Taking advantage of the characteristics of the novel compact external loop recorder (ELR; eMEMO®), which is waterproof and has an automatic arrhythmia detection and monitoring function for up to 14 days, we investigated the usefulness of ELR measurement, especially during bathing. Methods: We included 294 patients (102 males and 192 females) who presented with palpitations as their main complaint from April 2021 to September 2022, with a mean age of 57.0 ± 17.4 years. The average wearing period of the ELR was 4.5 ± 0.9 days. Results: ELR for longer than 24 h led to the first arrhythmia detection in 170 (21.3%) of the 799 cases of all detected arrhythmias, including 11 with premature atrial contraction, 50 with premature ventricular contraction, 8 with atrial fibrillation, 32 with supraventricular tachycardia, and 21 with sick sinus syndrome. They had low noise contamination during measurement. Arrhythmic events during bathing were observed in 52 patients, effectively detecting arrhythmia during bathing, which was difficult with the usual 24-h Holter electrocardiography (ECG). In addition, the itching and rash of the skin at the electrode attachment over a period of up to 5 days were very mild, indicating the comfort of the waterproof patch-type electrode. Conclusions: The patch-type ELR (eMEMO®) with waterproof design is capable of continuous recording regardless of restrictions such as bathing or exercise and is useful for detecting stable arrhythmias in patients with palpitations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.