Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40636691›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025

Diagnostic value of CT radiomics and clinical features in differentiating focal organizing pneumonia from peripheral lung cancer.

Weihua Tang, Huadong Chen, Peijun Liu, Yunxuan Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Weihua Tang *Graduate Training Base, Jinzhou Medical University (Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University), Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Huadong Chen *Department of Radiology, The Central Hospital of Enshi Tujia and Miao Autonomous Prefecture, Enshi, China.
Peijun Liu *Department of Radiology, The Central Hospital of Enshi Tujia and Miao Autonomous Prefecture, Enshi, China.
Yunxuan ZhangGraduate Training Base, Jinzhou Medical University (Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University), Wuhan, Hubei, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic value of computed tomography (CT) radiomics combined with clinical characteristics in differentiating focal organizing pneumonia (FOP) from peripheral lung cancer (PLC). Methods: A total of 60 FOP patients admitted between June 2023 and June 2024 were included as the FOP group, while 60 PLC patients were assigned to the PLC group. General clinical and imaging data were collected for both groups. Logistic regression analysis was employed to identify independent risk factors for FOP. Radiomics features were extracted from CT images of FOP patients, and the Lasso method was used to select key radiomics features and calculate CT radiomics scores. The diagnostic performance of CT radiomics and clinical characteristics for FOP was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Results: There were no statistically significant differences in age, gender, lung tissue boundary, pleural indentation sign, vascular convergence sign, pleural traction sign, or bronchial air sign between the FOP and PLC groups ( Conclusion: Pleural adhesion, lesion location in the outer lung zone, liquefaction necrosis, cavity formation, and long spiculation are key risk factors for FOP. Both CT radiomics and clinical characteristics can aid in the differentiation of FOP from PLC, and their combination significantly enhances diagnostic accuracy.

Indexed as

clinical featurescomputed tomographyfocal organizing pneumoniaperipheral lung cancerradiomics

Identifiers

PMID40636691
PMCPMC12237632

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.