ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025
Machine learning-based preoperative prediction of perioperative venous thromboembolism in Chinese lung cancer patients: a retrospective cohort study.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Risk prediction models for venous thromboembolism in lung cancer patients after surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Pooled it
- Construction and verification of a nomogram to predict the probability of venous thromboembolism in lung cancer patients.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2026Article
- Postpartum depression risk prediction using explainable machine learning algorithms.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Perioperative venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a severe complication in lung cancer surgery. Traditional prediction models have limitations in handling complex clinical data, whereas machine learning (ML) offers enhanced predictive accuracy. This study aimed to develop and validate an ML-based model for preoperative VTE risk assessment. Methods: A retrospective cohort of 1,013 lung cancer patients who underwent surgery at the First Hospital of Jilin University (April 2021-December 2023) was analyzed. Preoperative clinical and laboratory data were collected, and six key predictors-age, mean corpuscular volume, mean corpuscular hemoglobin, fibrinogen, D-dimer, and albumin-were identified using univariate analysis and Lasso regression. Eight ML models, including extreme gradient boosting (XGB), random forest, logistic regression, and support vector machines, were trained and evaluated using AUC, precision-recall curves, decision curve analysis, and calibration curves. Results: VTE occurred in 175 patients (17.3%). The XGB model demonstrated the highest predictive performance (AUC: 0.99 training, 0.66 validation; AUPRC: 0.323), with age and mean corpuscular volume identified as the most influential predictors. An online prediction tool was developed for clinical application. Conclusion: The ML-based XGB model provides a reliable preoperative risk assessment for VTE in lung cancer patients, enabling early risk stratification and personalized thromboprophylaxis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.