Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40636679›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of women's health2025

Implementation of Patient Complaint Management Mechanisms for Quality Improvement in Maternal Health Services: Exploration of Provider Perspectives at Mkuranga District Hospital.

Francis August, Tumaini Nyamhanga, Deodatus Conatus Kakoko, Amani Anaeli, Mughwira Ally Mwangu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of women's health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Francis AugustDepartment of Development Studies, School of Public Health and Social Sciences, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.ORCID 0000-0003-0744-7959
Tumaini NyamhangaDepartment of Development Studies, School of Public Health and Social Sciences, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Deodatus Conatus KakokoDepartment of Behavioural Sciences, School of Public Health and Social Sciences, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Amani AnaeliDepartment of Development Studies, School of Public Health and Social Sciences, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Mughwira Ally MwanguDepartment of Development Studies, School of Public Health and Social Sciences, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.ORCID 0000-0003-2863-0955

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Although patient complaints are stressful, they are regarded as useful when framed as learning avenues (ie checks and balances in service delivery), further contributing to quality improvement mechanisms and enhancing accountability. A well-structured system of receiving and managing complaints may result in, but is not limited to, improved accountability, control of abuse and vulgar language, and assurance/compliance with the code of conduct or procedure. Tanzania established a National Guide for Complaint Management in Health Facilities. It is a prerequisite in Health facilities to enable to use of evidence from the complaints process for quality improvement. Despite the emphasis on feedback from patient concerns and the availability of a guide for patient concern management in Tanzania, there is a paucity of information on how well patients' complaints are received, dealt with, and managed by district hospitals, especially those emerging from maternal, newborn, and child health services. Objective: This study aimed to assess providers' perspectives on the implementation of Tanzania's guidelines for managing patient concerns in service delivery. Methods: A qualitative approach was used for data collection, and content analysis was performed. Results: The findings underscore the challenges related to hospital infrastructure for receiving patients' complaints, ie awareness and enthusiasm to use them, how complaints are dealt with, ie processing of the complaints, feedback mechanisms, ie learning from the complaints, integrating lessons learned from the complaints into service delivery, and quality improvement mechanisms in maternal health services. Findings are framed as barriers and facilitators of the process of receiving complaints and processing complaints/concerns, together with feedback mechanisms. Conclusion: The implementation of patient complaint mechanisms has remained ineffective despite the reported enablers, which smooth the implementation of patients' complaints, such as the availability of structures and guidelines, citizens' engagement/participation, self-esteem, and enthusiasm.

Indexed as

accountability mechanismsmaternal healthpatient complaintsquality improvement

Identifiers

PMID40636679
PMCPMC12239899

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.