ReviewCureus2025
Spinal Mechanisms of Pain Modulation by Spinal Cord Stimulation: A Systematic Review.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative Efficacy of Short-Term Spinal Cord Stimulation for Subacute Zoster-Associated Pain: A Three-Group Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.Pain and therapy · 2026Article
- Differential target multiplexed SCS (DTM SCS): a rational hypothesis.Pain medicine (Malden, Mass.) · 2026Review
- Article
- Comparative Efficacy of Pulsed Radiofrequency-Based and Related Interventions for Postherpetic Neuralgia: A Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Journal of pain research · 2026Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is a widely used neuromodulation therapy for chronic neuropathic pain, including failed back surgery syndrome and complex regional pain syndrome, but its mechanisms of action remain incompletely defined. This systematic review examined 40 unique preclinical animal studies to classify spinal mechanisms underlying SCS-induced analgesia. A comprehensive database search including PubMed, MEDLINE, and Cochrane was conducted through October 2024 following PRISMA guidelines. Studies were included if they investigated SCS effects on spinal cord cells such as dorsal horn neurons, dorsal column fibers, interneurons, or glia, and excluded if they involved brain structures. Mechanisms were categorized into three domains: inhibition of ascending nociceptive transmission (n = 22), enhancement of descending inhibition (n = 5), and neuroimmune modulation via microglial and astrocytic pathways (n = 13). SCS was shown to enhance inhibitory signaling, reduce excitatory neurotransmitter release, and modulate dorsal horn activity at molecular and electroneurophysiological levels. It also promoted descending inhibition via serotonergic, opioid, and cholinergic mechanisms. Neuroimmune effects included suppression of proinflammatory cytokines and modulation of microglial and astrocyte activity, often through MAPK-related signaling. Risk of bias was assessed using the SYRCLE tool, revealing a variable methodological quality. The experimental frameworks utilized either neuropathic or inflammatory pain models, which exhibit substantial clinical relevance to chronic pain phenomena. Collectively, these findings suggest that SCS exerts analgesic effects through integrated spinal mechanisms involving neuronal inhibition, descending modulation, and glial suppression. However, the exclusive reliance on animal models limits direct clinical translatability, and future studies are needed to validate whether these mechanistic insights reliably extend to human physiology and therapeutic outcomes. This review provides a mechanistic framework to guide translational strategies for optimizing SCS therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.