ArticleCureus2025
Assessment of Malaria Burden and Community Response to Control and Management Programs.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionMalaria continues to be a significant public health issue, particularly in tropical and subtropical regions. Despite extensive efforts to reduce its burden through various control programs, malaria remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality. This study aims to assess the burden of malaria in a community and evaluate the community's response to malaria control and management programs.
objectiveThis study aimed to assess the prevalence of malaria and evaluate the community's awareness, participation, and response to malaria control and management programs. METHODOLOGY: This cross-sectional study included 550 participants from a community-based population. Data were collected through interviews, surveys, and medical records to determine malaria prevalence, treatment-seeking behavior, and knowledge of malaria control measures such as insecticide-treated nets (ITNs), indoor residual spraying (IRS), and antimalarial treatments.
resultsThe study found a malaria prevalence of 32% (176 participants), with higher rates in females at 35% (96 out of 275) compared to males at 30% (81 out of 275). A total of 85% (468 participants) recognized malaria symptoms. Awareness of prevention methods was reported by 72% (396 participants) for ITNs and 58% (319 participants) for IRS. Regarding treatment-seeking behavior, 60% (330 participants) visited health facilities, while 25% (138 participants) relied on traditional healers. Participation in malaria control programs was moderate: 62% (341 participants) reported using ITNs, and 50% (275 participants) had participated in IRS activities. Identified barriers included a lack of awareness in 30% (165 participants) and high costs in 20% (110 participants). Socioeconomic status influenced program engagement, with higher participation observed among individuals from wealthier households.
conclusionAlthough malaria control and management programs have had a positive impact, only 62% (341 participants) used ITNs and 50% (275 participants) engaged in IRS, indicating a gap in community adherence. Despite 85% (468 participants) being aware of malaria symptoms, knowledge and practical application of preventive measures remain suboptimal. Improving public education, enhancing access to malaria control tools, and addressing socioeconomic barriers are essential to effectively reduce the malaria burden in the community.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.