ArticleCureus2025
Personalized Ophthalmic Anesthesia: A Regression Analysis of Patient Characteristics, Surgical Profiles, and Anesthesia Protocols for Outcome Prediction.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to develop a predictive model for personalized ophthalmic anesthesia by combining patient demographics, surgical profiles, and anesthesia protocols. Exploratory data analysis, inferential statistics, and various machine learning techniques were applied to a synthetic dataset of 350 simulated patient records, each containing 75 clinical features. The primary outcomes included recovery time and satisfaction postoperatively. Correlation matrices, ANOVA F-values, and Recursive Feature Elimination (RFE) were employed for feature selection, with a focus on both clinical relevance and statistical significance. The Random Forest model was found to outperform all other models, achieving an R² of 0.91, MAE of 0.11, and RMSE of 0.14. The most salient predictors of recovery time, identified by SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) analysis, were surgical blood loss, body mass index (BMI), and platelet count. The dataset underwent rigorous preprocessing, including imputation, normalization, and outlier management. The non-normality of recovery time (p < 0.0001) was further confirmed by the Shapiro-Wilk test, suggesting that non-parametric methods would be appropriate. The overestimation of predictive accuracy in the synthetic data, which arises from reduced variability and idealized feature distributions, should be considered preliminary even for high-performing models. Supported the regression-based models' capability in aiding the personalized anesthesia protocol architecture design. Future projects should incorporate external validation to assess generalizability and clinical utility using external datasets from clinical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.