Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40636572›Full record

ArticleiLIVER2023

Systematic review and meta-analysis: Comparing hepatocellular and cholestatic patterns of drug-induced liver injury.

Georgia Zeng, Guy D Eslick, Martin Weltman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in iLIVER, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Georgia ZengDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Nepean Hospital, Kingswood, Australia.
Guy D EslickNHMRC Centre of Research Excellence in Digestive Health, Hunter Medical Research Institute, The University of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia.
Martin WeltmanDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Nepean Hospital, Kingswood, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and aims: Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is a leading cause of death from acute liver failure (ALF). Hy's law warns that a hepatocellular pattern of injury accompanied by jaundice and normal alkaline phosphatase (ALP) levels is associated with a 10% or greater chance of progression to transplant or liver-related death. This meta-analysis of DILI studies evaluates acute and chronic outcomes of DILI according to clinical pattern of injury. Methods: We conducted a systematic search using electronic databases PubMed and EMBASE through to 8 March 2022. Our primary outcome was to compare acute outcomes including ALF, liver-related death, and liver transplant between patients experiencing hepatocellular, cholestatic, and mixed patterns of DILI. Our secondary outcome was to compare the rate of DILI chronicity between patients of these three differing patterns of injury. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using a random-effects model. Results: Overall, 12 studies comprising 4290 patients were included. Patients with cholestatic DILI demonstrated similar rates of ALF (OR: 0.80, 95% CI: 0.46-1.40, Conclusion: Hy's law conceives severe DILI as an exclusive consequence of hepatocellular pattern of injury. Our results demonstrate that cholestatic injury can be associated with similarly poor rates of ALF and liver-related fatality, as well as higher rates of chronic DILI.

Indexed as

Acute liver failureDrug-induced liver injuryIdiosyncratic hepatotoxicityLiver-related deathMeta-analysis

Identifiers

PMID40636572
PMCPMC12212731

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.