ArticleiLIVER2023
More precise measurement of irregular splenic volume in cirrhotic patients with portal hypertension.
Article in iLIVER, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and aims: Splenomegaly often occurs in cirrhotic patients with portal hypertension (PHT), and therefore, the efficacy and accuracy of conventional methods for measuring splenic volume are a matter of question in these patients. Here, we developed a novel approach to assess true splenic volume more precisely. Methods: High-quality thin-slice computed tomography data of 112 cirrhotic patients with PHT were obtained and reviewed. Both the conventional measurement and a novel formula obtained from 3-dimensional reconstruction software were used to estimate splenic volume, and the accuracy was compared and verified. Results: In PHT patients, the splenic volume calculated using the conventional method was significantly less than that calculated using the 3-dimensional software. We found that the splenic volume was significantly positively correlated with splenic indices of length (L), thickness (T), and width (W) and also the diameter of the splenic vein. Using these indices, we propose 2 novel formulas using the software to estimate the splenic volume more accurately: SV = 69.686 × L + 53.077 × W + 103.525 × T + 314.510 × diameter of splenic vein -2266.209 ( Conclusion: Although the conventional formula has been widely used for years, it is not suitable for an enlarged spleen. We developed 2 novel formulas for estimating splenic volume from clinical data that were more appropriate for cirrhotic patients with PHT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.