ArticleiLIVER2023
The transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt: Smaller stent diameters are required to optimize pressure response.
Article in iLIVER, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt on platelet count and exact spleen volume segmented on computed tomography.Acta radiologica open · 2025Article
- Controlled expansion stent grafts versus legacy stent grafts for transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt: a single-centre retrospective study on the incidence of hepatic encephalopathy.CVIR endovascular · 2025Article
- Article
- Milestones to optimize of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt technique as a method for the treatment of portal hypertension complications.World journal of hepatology · 2024Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and aims: The present treatment goal of the transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is a portosystemic pressure gradient of ≤12 mmHg or its reduction by >50%. This study relates the stent diameter to the reduction of the pressure gradient and attempts to predict the appropriate stent diameter necessary to reach the treatment goal. Methods: Pressure response, super response, and poor response were investigated in 208 de-novo TIPS patients and defined as post-TIPS gradients between >6 and 12 mmHg, ≤6 mmHg, or not reaching the goal (>12 mmHg, reduction <50%), respectively. Pressures were related to the smallest stent diameters measured by planimetry of the radiographic image. Results: Responders (65%), super responders (26%), or poor responders (9%) had comparable stent diameters of 7.2 ± 1.0 mm, but different post-TIPS gradients (9.7 ± 1.9 mmHg, 4.5 ± 1.5 mmHg, and 14.2 ± 1.4 mmHg, Conclusion: Most patients reached the treatment goal with stent diameters of <8 mm. Overtreatment (super response, gradient ≤6 mmHg) can be prevented by stent diameters as small as 6 mm. The individual response was not related to the stent diameter and not predictable. Cardiac dysfunction may play an important role by its effect on the right atrial (preload) and portal pressure (afterload).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.