ArticleiLIVER2024
Diagnostic performance comparisons of two commonly used multi-biomarker-based scores for detection of hepatocellular carcinoma in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease.
Article in iLIVER, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- [Diagnosis and treatment of liver diseases in the era of artificial intelligence].Zhonghua gan zang bing za zhi = Zhonghua ganzangbing zazhi = Chinese journal of hepatology · 2025Review
- Low preoperative serum creatinine levels are associated with poor prognosis in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma after liver resection: a multicenter study.BMC gastroenterology · 2025Article
- The Value of Clinical Decision Support in Healthcare: A Focus on Screening and Early Detection.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Prognostic Value of the ASAP Score for Patients Undergoing Hepatic Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Multicenter Analysis of 1,239 Patients.Journal of clinical and experimental hepatologyArticle
- Comparison of the GALAD, GAAP, and ASAP Scores for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Detection in Patients With Chronic Liver Diseases.Journal of clinical and experimental hepatologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and aims: The ASAP and GALAD scores are widely used diagnostic models for detecting hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), incorporating factors such as sex, age, alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), protein induced by vitamin K absence or antagonist-II (PIVKA-II), and lens culinaris agglutinin-reactive fraction of AFP (AFP-L3%). This study compares the diagnostic efficacy of the ASAP and GALAD scores in the early detection of HCC in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Methods: NAFLD patients with and without HCC were recruited from 12 Chinese tertiary hospitals. Serum levels of AFP, PIVKA-II, and AFP-L3% were measured. The diagnostic accuracy of individual biomarkers, the ASAP score, and the GALAD score in detecting NAFLD-HCC at various stages was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and area under the curve (AUC) values. Results: In a cohort of 147 NAFLD-HCC cases and 460 NAFLD controls, both the ASAP and GALAD scores outperformed individual biomarkers in detecting NAFLD-HCC. The ASAP score demonstrated a high AUC of 0.910 (sensitivity: 80.3%, specificity: 92.8%) for identifying NAFLD-HCC at all stages, surpassing AFP (AUC: 0.716, Conclusion: The ASAP score, which excludes the AFP-L3% indicator, demonstrated superior performance in differentiating NAFLD-HCC compared to the GALAD score, suggesting its potential for early screening of HCC in NAFLD patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.