ArticleiLIVER2025
Efficacy and safety of PD-1 inhibitors for advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma with or without MAFLD.
Article in iLIVER, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hepatic Artery Infusion Chemotherapy for Cholangiocarcinoma in 2025.Liver cancer · 2026Review
- The role of ADAM8 in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.Discover oncology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This study sought to evaluate the efficacy and safety of programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) inhibitor immunotherapy specifically in metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD)-associated intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) patients, in comparison to those without MAFLD. Methods: We retrospectively included 161 ICC patients, both with and without MAFLD, who underwent PD-1 inhibitors between March 2019 and August 2024. Subsequent locoregional interventions (e.g., hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy) and second-line systemic agents (e.g., lenvatinib) were allowed. The primary endpoints included overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), while the secondary endpoints comprised objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and adverse events (AEs). Results: The MAFLD group included 20 patients, while the Non-MAFLD group comprised 141 patients. The OS was 18.0 months for the MAFLD group and 20.1 months for the Non-MAFLD group, while the median PFS was 8.0 and 11.5 months, respectively. According to the modified RECIST (mRECIST) criteria, the Non-MAFLD group exhibited a greater clinical benefit, reflected in higher ORR and DCR (45.4% vs. 20.0%, Conclusion: This study demonstrated that PD-1 inhibitors resulted in similarly prolonged OS and PFS between ICC patients with and without MAFLD, but a superior tumor response was observed in patients without MAFLD. Additionally, the Non-MAFLD group experienced a significantly lower incidence of AEs than the MAFLD group undergoing PD-1 inhibitors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.