ReviewFrontiers in psychiatry2025
Research trends in esketamine for depression over the past decade: a bibliometric analysis.
Review in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Bibliometric Analysis of Research on Natural Medicines for Depression from 2004 to 2024.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Patients suffering from depression frequently encounter extended periods of low moods and lack of enjoyment or enthusiasm for activities. It leads to suicidal thoughts and presents a potential hazard to their safety. Nowadays, there has been significant progress in researching the effectiveness and safety of esketamine in treating depression. Hence, this paper employs bibliometric analysis to investigate the evolution and future research trajectories of this domain. Methods: We utilize Excel, VOSviewer, and CiteSpace software to generate bibliometric network visualizations to analyze, construct, and quantitatively evaluate pertinent literature, which facilitates a lucid and intuitive presentation of the trends and frontiers in this research domain. Results: Annual publications increased from 2015 to 2024, totaling 925 articles, with 286 studies published in 2024. The USA published the most papers (n=308), followed by China (n=260) and Canada (n=114). Three of the top journals were Journal of Affective Disorders (n=56,IF=4.90), Frontiers in Psychiatry (n=38,IF=5.44), and International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology (n=21,IF=4.50). The most published authors were McIntyre, Roger S (n=52), followed by Hashimoto, Kenji (n=49), Rosenblat, Joshua D (n=41). The keywords that have been relevant to the topic for the last decade are "treatment-resistant depression", "efficacy", "antidepressant" and "suicidal ideation". Conclusions: This bibliometric analysis showed a significant increase in research on the use of esketamine in the treatment of depression. The main focus of current research is still the assessment of long-term use safety. In addition, the huge difference in research resources between developed countries and low- and middle-income countries remains an unresolved issue.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.