ArticleNeural computing & applications2025
Fourier convolutional decoder: reconstructing solar flare images via deep learning.
Article in Neural computing & applications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Reconstructing images from observational data is a complex and time-consuming process, particularly in astronomy, where traditional algorithms like CLEAN require extensive computational resources and expert interpretation to distinguish genuine features from artifacts, especially without ground truth data. To address these challenges, we developed the Fourier convolutional decoder (FCD), a custom-made overcomplete autoencoder trained on simulated data with available ground truth. This enables the network to generate outputs that closely approximate expected ground truth. The model's versatility was demonstrated on both simulated and observational datasets, with a specific application to data from the spectrometer/telescope for imaging X-rays (STIX) on the solar orbiter. In the simulated environment, FCD's performance was evaluated using multiple-image reconstruction metrics, demonstrating its ability to produce accurate images with minimal artifacts. For observational data, FCD was compared with benchmark algorithms, focusing on reconstruction metrics related to Fourier components. Our evaluation found that FCD is the fastest imaging method, with runtimes on the order of milliseconds. Its computational cost is comparable to the most efficient reconstruction algorithm and 280
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.