Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40636309›Full record

ReviewAdvanced pharmaceutical bulletin2025

Nanovaccines against Cervical Cancer: Reliable Strategies to Circumvent Limitations of Traditional Therapeutic Vaccines.

Enwa Felix Oghenemaro, Safia Obaidur Rab, Ebraheem Abdu Musad Saleh, Asmaa F Kassem, Jasur Rizaev, Deepak Nathiya, Parjinder Kaur, M Ravi Kumar, Karam Kadhim, Ahmed M Hashim

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Advanced pharmaceutical bulletin, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Enwa Felix OghenemaroDepartment of Pharmaceutical Microbiology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Delta State University, Abraka, Delta State, Nigeria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4643-1458
Safia Obaidur RabDepartment of Clinical Laboratory Sciences, College of Applied Medical Science, King Khalid and University, Abha, Saudi Arabia.
Ebraheem Abdu Musad SalehDepartment of Chemistry, College of Science and Humanities in Al-Kharj, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Al-Kharj, 11942, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4683-6770
Asmaa F KassemDepartment of Chemistry, College of Science and Humanities in Al-Kharj, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Al-Kharj, 11942, Saudi Arabia.
Jasur RizaevDepartment of Public Health and Healthcare Management, Rector, Samarkand State Medical University, 18, Amir Temur Street, Samarkand, Uzbekistan.
Deepak NathiyaDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, NIMS Institute of Pharmacy, NIMS University Rajasthan, Jaipur, India.
Parjinder KaurChandigarh Pharmacy College, Chandigarh Group of Colleges-Jhanjeri, Mohali 140307, Punjab, India.
M Ravi KumarDepartment of Basic Science & Humanities, Raghu Engineering College, Visakhapatnam, India.
Karam KadhimMedical Laboratory Techniques Department, College of Health and Medical Techniques, Al-Mustaqbal University, Babylon, Iraq.
Ahmed M HashimMazaya University College, Dhiqar, Iraq.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cervical cancer ranks fourth in terms of diagnosis and cancer-related deaths in women worldwide. Despite the approval of prophylactic vaccines against cervical cancers, these vaccines are not able to eradicate the existing ones. Therefore, various platforms have been developed to design therapeutic vaccines against cervical cancers, including DNA/RNA-based, protein/peptide-based, vector-based, and cell-based platforms. Despite the advantages of each platform, therapeutic vaccines have displayed limited clinical benefit in patients with cervical cancer, which is partially associated with inefficient delivery of vaccine components. To address these issues, different nanoplatforms have been developed to carry cellular or molecular components of vaccines to target cells and lymphoid tissues, thus promoting the durability and potency of immune responses against tumor cells and antigens besides decreasing side effects. Moreover, nanoparticles (NPs), as adjuvants and/or carriers, provide other advantages, including sufficient antigen loading and uptake by antigen-presenting cells (APCs), adaptable antigen presentation, high immunogenicity, high stability, increased lymph node retention, and precise targeting. Thus, nanovaccines also lead us to design and develop personalized vaccines against cervical cancer. Here, we discuss platforms that have been used in clinical trials for the treatment of cervical cancer, their advantages and disadvantages, platforms for developing nanovaccines, and how they improve the therapeutic efficacy of vaccines.

Indexed as

Cervical cancerImmune responseNanotechnologyNanovaccineTherapeutic vaccine

Identifiers

PMID40636309
PMCPMC12235371

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.