ReviewAdvanced pharmaceutical bulletin2025
Nanovaccines against Cervical Cancer: Reliable Strategies to Circumvent Limitations of Traditional Therapeutic Vaccines.
Review in Advanced pharmaceutical bulletin, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cervical cancer ranks fourth in terms of diagnosis and cancer-related deaths in women worldwide. Despite the approval of prophylactic vaccines against cervical cancers, these vaccines are not able to eradicate the existing ones. Therefore, various platforms have been developed to design therapeutic vaccines against cervical cancers, including DNA/RNA-based, protein/peptide-based, vector-based, and cell-based platforms. Despite the advantages of each platform, therapeutic vaccines have displayed limited clinical benefit in patients with cervical cancer, which is partially associated with inefficient delivery of vaccine components. To address these issues, different nanoplatforms have been developed to carry cellular or molecular components of vaccines to target cells and lymphoid tissues, thus promoting the durability and potency of immune responses against tumor cells and antigens besides decreasing side effects. Moreover, nanoparticles (NPs), as adjuvants and/or carriers, provide other advantages, including sufficient antigen loading and uptake by antigen-presenting cells (APCs), adaptable antigen presentation, high immunogenicity, high stability, increased lymph node retention, and precise targeting. Thus, nanovaccines also lead us to design and develop personalized vaccines against cervical cancer. Here, we discuss platforms that have been used in clinical trials for the treatment of cervical cancer, their advantages and disadvantages, platforms for developing nanovaccines, and how they improve the therapeutic efficacy of vaccines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.