ReviewInternational journal of general medicine2025
Neuromuscular Blocking Agents and Reversal Agents Usage, and Neuromuscular Blockade Monitoring in the Intensive Care Unit - Review Article.
Review in International journal of general medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Immediate extubation post-surgery in cardiac patients: a retrospective single-center case series and literature review.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2026Review
- Neuromuscular Blocking Agents in Anesthesia: A Narrative Review of Contemporary Challenges and Reversal Approaches.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Need for Pharmacologic Targets and Therapeutics for Postoperative Respiratory Depression and Pulmonary Complications in Veterinary Medicine.Journal of pain research · 2026Review
- Use of Neuromuscular Blocking Agents in Elderly Patients: A Narrative Review in Geriatric Medicine.International journal of general medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBAs) are widely used in anesthesiology. However, their use in Intensive Care Units (ICUs) has yet to be fully standardized. Due to numerous conflicting reports or insufficient scientific evidence, there are significant controversies surrounding the use of these drugs, particularly in patients requiring ventilatory support for ARDS, those with increased intracranial pressure, or patients undergoing therapeutic hypothermia (especially after cardiac arrest resuscitation). ICU patients are typically critically ill, often in sepsis, with multiple comorbidities, multi-organ failure, homeostasis disturbances, and requiring multiple medications. These conditions can significantly affect the potency and action of skeletal muscle relaxants. In recent years, the importance of monitoring neuromuscular blockade has been emphasized. Clinical examination, although widely used, has limited applicability in ICU settings. Peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) and train-of-four (TOF) monitoring are qualitative methods, whereas quantitative techniques, which provide objective measurements, are increasingly recommended for managing neuromuscular blockade. Most guidelines currently focus on perioperative monitoring, and there is a lack of detailed recommendations for using these methods in the ICU. This article discusses existing research on the use of skeletal muscle relaxants, neuromuscular blockade reversal agents, and monitoring methods for neuromuscular blockade in intensive care units.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.