ArticleEuropean journal of case reports in internal medicine2025
Unexpected Falsely High Vancomycin Concentrations in a Patient with Endocarditis During Routine Therapeutic Drug Monitoring.
Article in European journal of case reports in internal medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Vancomycin is a glycopeptide antibiotic indicated for the treatment of infections caused by methicillin-resistant Case description: An 87-year-old female was admitted with diagnosis of endocarditis. She was started on antibiotic therapy with intravenous vancomycin. The first vancomycin level registered in our hospital was 36.4 μg/ml. Because this value exceeded the critical threshold (15-20 μg/ml) the prescription was interrupted. New vancomycin concentration tests were indicated for the next days with 65.8 μg/ml, 73 μg/ml, 55.1 μg/ml, 77.9 μg/ml and 100 μg/ml results. Two samples were reanalysed in Hospital Universitario La Paz and were undetectable. Our Clinical Analysis Department found an analytical interference; however, the responsible molecule could not be identified, so the clinical team changed antibiotic treatment to daptomycin, and the infectious condition of the patient improved. Conclusions: It is recommended that clinicians have a high index of suspicion to investigate cases where drug concentrations do not correlate with clinical expectations. Healthcare professionals need to understand that occasional interference still occurs due to the binding of proteins. LEARNING POINTS: Unknown compounds or mechanisms may interfere with vancomycin assays.Assay interference should be suspected in patients with persistently high vancomycin levels who continue to deteriorate clinically.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.