Effect of radiation exposure on oral mucosal cells: An

Silpi Chatterjee, Pallavi Choudhary, Asim Mustafa Khan, Reshma V J, Muhaseena Muhamood, Arpita Maitra

Abstract read

In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

0citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Silpi ChatterjeeDepartment of Public Health Dentistry, Dr. D.Y.Patil Dental College & Hospital, Dr D.Y.Patil Vidyapeeth, Pune, Maharashtra, India.

Pallavi ChoudharyDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Consultant at Ramakrishna mission hospital and T.B sanatorium, Consultant at K.C Roy memorial hospital and heart centre, Ranchi, Jharkhand, India.

Asim Mustafa KhanDepartment of Biomedical dental sciences, College of dentistry Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia.

Reshma V JDepartment of Biomedical dental sciences, College of dentistry Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia.

Muhaseena MuhamoodDepartment of Biomedical dental sciences, College of dentistry Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia.

Arpita MaitraDepartment of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Guru Nanak Institute of Dental Sciences and Research, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Radiation generates toxic reactions and DNA damage in oral mucosal cells which depends on the exposure dose during laboratory tests. The survival rate of cells dropped from 98.6% in non-irradiated controls to 40.8% at 8 Gy while both structural cell alterations and DNA damage manifestations became evident. The extent of DNA damage in cells increased as radiation doses became higher according to findings from the Comet assay. Radiation produces marked impact on the defense capacity of oral tissues. Protective measures must be implemented as an essential way to prevent damage to oral mucosa tissues exposed to radiation.

Indexed as

cell viabilitycytotoxicityDNA damagegenotoxicityin vitro studyoral mucosal cellsRadiation exposureradiation-induced damage

Identifiers

PMID40636216

DOI10.6026/973206300210823

PMCPMC12236581

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

LicenceCC BY

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.