Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40636214›Full record

ArticleBioinformation2025

Analysis of fracture resistance in teeth obturated with graphene oxide-modified sealers.

Unmesh Khanvilkar, Arpita Anand, Anshu Nishchhal, Jyoti Kumari, Peeyush Kumar Chaudhary, Vinay Rao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Unmesh KhanvilkarDepartment of Micro Dentistry, MUHS, Mumbai Regional Center, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Arpita AnandDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Dental College Azamgarh, Azamgarh, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Anshu NishchhalDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Dental College Azamgarh, Azamgarh, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Jyoti KumariDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Dental College Azamgarh, Azamgarh, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Peeyush Kumar ChaudharyDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Dental College Azamgarh, Azamgarh, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Vinay RaoDepartment of Conservative Dentistry, Endodontics and Aesthetic Dentistry, AMC Dental College, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Analysis of tooth resistance after obtaining them with regular sealers in addition to calcium silicate based ones and graphene oxide modified versions is of interest. Hence, 3 groups containing sixty premolars underwent universal testing machine evaluation. The mean fracture resistance value for teeth treated with graphene oxide (GO)-modified sealer reached 530 ± 22 N in Group 3 which resulted in significantly better results than the other tested groups (p < 0.05). We show that GO-added sealers lead to superior structural reinforcement for teeth which have undergone root canal treatment. Introducing GO into endodontic treatment regimens would lower the risk of fractures and result in better treatment performance.

Indexed as

biomechanical propertiesendodonticsFracture resistancegraphene oxideobturationroot canal sealer

Identifiers

PMID40636214
PMCPMC12236571

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.