Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40636202›Full record

ArticleBioinformation2025

Comparative evaluation of post-operative pain following single vs. multiple visit pulpectomy: A clinical assessment.

Jyoti Solanki, Bhagyesh J Cheta, Arvind Kumar Uikey, Amit Kumar, Anil Raj, Oindrella Ghosh, Pratik Surana

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jyoti SolankiDepartment of Dentistry, Mahamaya Rajkiya Allopathic Medical College Ambedkar Nagar, Uttar Pradesh- 224227, India.
Bhagyesh J ChetaDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Government Dental College and Hospital Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India.
Arvind Kumar UikeyDepartment of Dentistry, Government Medical College, Seoni, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Amit KumarDepartment of Dentistry, Lord Buddha Koshi Medical College and Hospital, Saharsa, Bihar, India.
Anil RajDepartment of Public Health Dentistry, Patna Dental College and Hospital, Patna, Bihar, India.
Oindrella GhoshDepartment of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, Kalinga Institute of Dental Sciences, Kalinga Institute of Industrial Technology (KIIT) Deemed to be University, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
Pratik SuranaDepartment of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, Maitri College of Dentistry and Research Centre, Durg, Chhattisgarh, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Post-operative pain between single-visit and multiple-visit pulpectomy in 50 children (ages 6-10 years) with irreversible pulpitis is compared. Participants were divided into two groups-Group A (single-visit) and Group B (multiple-visit) and pain was assessed using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at 6, 24, 48 and 72-hours post-operative. Group A consistently reported significantly lower pain levels (P < 0.05) than Group B. Thus, single-visit pulpectomy reduces post-operative pain more effectively thereby enhancing patient comfort and satisfaction.

Indexed as

multiple-visitpost-operative painPulpectomysingle-visitvisual analog scale

Identifiers

PMID40636202
PMCPMC12236553

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.