ArticleBioinformation2025
Evaluating healthcare services at MahaKumbh 2025, India: A mixed-methods study of visitor perceptions and public health strategies.
Article in Bioinformation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Maha Kumbh 2025 in India posed major public health challenges due to the high number of pilgrims gathering at a location. Hence, participants from Rama University, Kanpur, gathered visitor feedback on healthcare services during the event. A descriptive survey was conducted with 1000 attendees using a mixed-methods design. Quantitative data were analyzed using chi-square tests and logistic regression. High satisfaction scores were reported for service availability and medical staff competence. Cleanliness and hygiene received relatively lower ratings, indicating areas for improvement. Healthcare services were largely effective due to strong government and institutional efforts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.