Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40636195›Full record

ArticleBioinformation2025

Effect of bioceramic sealers in enhancing root canal healing.

Shankar S, Rajul Vivek, Nitu Chaubey, Vinay Rao, Sagar Hiwale, Nandhita S K

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Shankar SDepartment of Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics, NSVK Sri Venkateshwara Dental College & Hospital, Bannerghatta, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Rajul VivekDepartment of Prosthodontics and Crown & Bridge, Purvanchal Institute of Dental Sciences, Gorakhpur, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Nitu ChaubeyDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Purvanchal Institute of Dental Sciences, Gorakhpur, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Vinay RaoDepartment of Conservative Dentistry, Endodontics and Aesthetic Dentistry, AMC Dental College, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India.
Sagar HiwaleDepartment of Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics, Inderprastha Dental College & Hospital Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Nandhita S KDepartment of Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics, NSVK Sri Venkateshwara Dental College & Hospital, Bannerghatta, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Root canal treatment requires optimal sealing to stop infection from recurring while aiding the healing processes. Therefore, it is of interest to examine the analysis of bioceramic and conventional dental sealants using 100 patient samples within a period of six months. Bioceramic sealers achieved better results since 90% of patients experienced periapical healing compared to 75% in the conventional group. The bioceramic group excelled in both reducing pain and attaining superior radiographic sealing quality. Thus, healing progresses better when dentists use bioceramic sealers which enhance root canal therapy according to expert recommendations.

Indexed as

bioactivityBioceramic sealersdental sealersendodonticspain reductionperiapical lesionsroot canal healing

Identifiers

PMID40636195
PMCPMC12236570

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.