Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40636178›Full record

ArticleBioinformation2025

Antibiotic prophylaxis among Indian women undergoing cesarean sections.

Bhavani Kaveti, Gadiparthi Anusha, Priyadarshini Ramesh, Madhurika Jalakam, Prashannalakshmi A, Reema Reji, Yagvalkya Sharma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Bhavani KavetiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Sri Sai Ram Fertility and Women Health Care Hospital, Gaddiannaram, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
Gadiparthi AnushaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Vijay Marie Hospital, Veernagar, Saifabad Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
Priyadarshini RameshDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Madras Medical College, Chennai, India.
Madhurika JalakamDepartment of ITU, Queen Elizabeth Queen Mother Hospital, East Kent Hospital University Foundation Trust, United Kingdom.
Prashannalakshmi ADepartment of Medicine, Tashkent Medical Academy, Urgench branch, Uzbekistan.
Reema RejiDepartment of Pediatrics, Dr. KM Cherian Institute of Medical Sciences, Umayattukkara Road, Kallissery P.O, Chengannur, Kerala, India.
Yagvalkya SharmaDepartment of Research, Kalp Research Work, Mathura, Uttar Pradesh, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cesarean sections are associated with a high risk of postoperative infections, making timely and appropriate antibiotic prophylaxis essential. Hence, a six-month study of 100 patients found 85% compliance with recommended guidelines, with SSIs (Surgical site infections) occurring in 3% of timely cases versus 9% in delayed cases. Deviations, such as delayed administration or inappropriate antibiotic use, modestly increased infection risk. Key factors in reducing SSIs were timely antibiotic delivery and appropriate selection. Improved training, surveillance and audits are recommended to enhance compliance so as to ensure safe obstetric surgical practices.

Indexed as

adherence to guidelineantibiotic prophylaxisCesarean sectionpostoperative infectionsurgical site infectiontertiary care hospital

Identifiers

PMID40636178
PMCPMC12236538

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.