Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40636173›Full record

ArticleBioinformation2025

Platelet-rich fibrin and chitosan dressings for healing after third molar extractions.

Ramakrishna Maiya G R, Gururaju C R, Siri Chandana Gonabhavi, Sunil Kumar Biraggari, Deepalakshmi S, Vinay Rao

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ramakrishna Maiya G RDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Sharavathi Dental College and Hospital, Shimoga, Karnataka, India.
Gururaju C RDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Sharavathi Dental College and Hospital, Shimoga, Karnataka, India.
Siri Chandana GonabhaviDepartment of Periodontics and Implantology, G. Pulla Reddy Dental College and Hospital, Kurnool, Andhra Pradesh, India.
Sunil Kumar BiraggariDepartment of Periodontics and Implantology, G. Pulla Reddy Dental College and Hospital, Kurnool, Andhra Pradesh, India.
Deepalakshmi SDepartment of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Dr. D.Y. Patil School of Dentistry, Nerul, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Vinay RaoDepartment of Conservative Dentistry, Endodontics and Aesthetic Dentistry, AMC Dental College, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The surgical removal of lower wisdom teeth produces both postoperative discomfort and treatment healing delays. Therefore, it is of interest to evaluate PRF therapy alongside chitosan-based dressing as treatment for 60 bilateral extraction patients. The patients who received PRF therapy experienced less pain (VAS score 3.5 vs 4.2) together with less swelling (70% reduction compared to 50%) and better healing scores (9.2 vs 8.1). The evaluative measurements using VAS and Landry's scale occurred on days 3 and 7 and day 14. The recommended treatment for boosted postoperative recovery reveals PRF as delivering better healing results than others.

Indexed as

chitosan-based dressingmandibular third molar extractionPlatelet-rich fibrinpostoperative healingrandomized clinical trial

Identifiers

PMID40636173
PMCPMC12236544

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.