ArticleDose-response : a publication of International Hormesis Society
A Breakthrough on Modeling Cancer Prevention and Elimination by Low Radiation Doses.
Article in Dose-response : a publication of International Hormesis Society. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Understanding the Radiation Adaptive Response: General Methodology and Theoretical Approaches to the Study of the Radioadaptation Phenomenon.Dose-response : a publication of International Hormesis SocietyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Previously the author was unable to develop a formal mathematical characterization of his probability-based hormetic relative risk (HRR) model for cancer prevention/elimination by absorbed doses ( Objective: To develop a formal mathematical characterization of the HRR model's disease prevention function Approach: Use distributed (over a population) individual-specific, natural-defenses-enhancing (E) and suppressing (S) dose thresholds. Results: Conclusion: The System of Radiological Protection needs to be updated to account for health benefits rather than invalid LNT-hypothesis-based phantom radiation-caused cancers from radiation doses <
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.