Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40636055›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025

A manual three-step latent profile analysis to discover phubbing risk profiles among university students.

Ömer Şimşek, Bülent Başaran

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ömer ŞimşekDepartment of Instructional Technologies, Dicle University, Diyarbakır, Türkiye.
Bülent BaşaranDepartment of Instructional Technologies, Dicle University, Diyarbakır, Türkiye.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Phubbing, snubbing others in favor of one's smartphone, is a growing concern among university students. This cross-sectional study aimed to identify distinct phubbing profiles among university students and examine the influence of various factors on these profiles, as well as their associations with loneliness, communication skills, and happiness. Latent profile analysis (LPA) was conducted on a convenience sample of 691 university students (71.9% female, 28.1% male; M = 22.50 years) from a state university in southeastern Turkey. The study found three unique phubbing profiles: Low (67.3%), Moderate (24%), and High (8.7%) phubbing risk. Gender and smartphone addiction were significant predictors of phubbing profiles, with females and those with higher smartphone addiction showing a higher likelihood of engaging in phubbing. Interestingly, insomnia, depression, socioeconomic status, number of friends, and frequency of social interactions did not significantly influence phubbing profiles. The study found that a higher risk of phubbing was associated with increased loneliness; however, no significant differences were observed between profiles in terms of communication skills or happiness. These findings underscore the importance of addressing smartphone addiction as a critical driver of phubbing and the potential for phubbing to exacerbate loneliness among university students. The study also suggests that future research should delve into the long-term effects of phubbing on social and psychological well-being and develop interventions targeting healthy digital behaviors.

Indexed as

distal outcomeslatent profile analysislonelinessmanual three-step approachphubbingsmartphoneuniversity students

Identifiers

PMID40636055
PMCPMC12239097

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.