Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40636044›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025

Showing-intentional communication-in dogs (

Marianne T E Heberlein, Lina V Oberliessen, Zsófia Virányi, Christiane Lutonsky, Dennis C Turner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Marianne T E Heberlein *Core Facility Wolf Science Center, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Lina V Oberliessen *Core Facility Wolf Science Center, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Zsófia VirányiMesserli Research Institute of Human-Animal Interactions, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Medical University of Vienna and University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Christiane LutonskySection of Physical Therapy, Clinical Department for Small Animals and Horses, Clinical Centre for Small Animal Health and Research, Small Animal Surgery, University of Veterinary Medicine, Vienna, Austria.
Dennis C TurnerAnimal Behavior, Department of Evolutionary Biology and Environmental Studies, University of Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The characterization of imperative pointing as intentional communication, aimed at eliciting specific actions from a partner, has been debated, with some suggesting it reflects an understanding of others as causal agents rather than attributing intentional states to them. While gaze alternation has been identified as an important form of intentional communication in humans and apes, its interpretation in dogs remains unclear. Methods: This research investigates dogs' capacity for gaze alternation and other showing behaviors, examining their flexibility in adjusting to the cooperativeness or knowledge state of their human partners. Two experiments were conducted: (1) hiding food in the presence of dogs either with or without their owners observing the hiding procedure, and (2) hiding food in the presence of dogs and a cooperative or a competitive human partner. In the first experiment the behaviors of 21 dogs and in the second experiment 23 dogs were analyzed. Results: Dogs exhibited more gaze alternation and food-directed showing behaviors when their owner lacked knowledge of the food location and in the presence of a cooperative partner. Conversely, they showed an empty hiding place to the competitive partner, suggesting an understanding of the partner's intention to consume the hidden reward. Discussion: In the two independent experiments, we showed how flexibly dogs adapt their showing behavior to the knowledge or expected behavior of their human partners. These findings confirm dogs' comprehension of the informative value of their behavior, suggesting that their showing behavior is a form of intentional communication.

Indexed as

Canis familiariscognitiondoggaze alternationintentionalintentional communicationreferentialshowing

Identifiers

PMID40636044
PMCPMC12239740

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.