Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40636041›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025

The effects of mentor support on Ed.D students' research creativity: mediating roles of research self-efficacy and learning engagement.

Haifei Miao, Lixing Zhao, Zhigang Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Haifei MiaoSchool of Education, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi'an, China.
Lixing ZhaoFaculty of Education and Liberal Studies, City University of Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Zhigang WangSchool of Education, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi'an, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Doctor of education (Ed.D) is a professional degree designed to cultivate highly specialized professionals in education, teaching, and educational leadership. Ed.D holds a crucial position within the higher education system, with its core mission being the cultivation of high-quality talent who possess strong research creativity. However, limited research has specifically addressed how to enhance the research creativity of Ed.D students in higher education. Methods: This study utilized a structural equation modeling approach to investigate the influence of mentor support on Ed.D students research creativity, with a focus on the chain mediating effects of research self-efficacy and learning engagement. A sample of 366 Chinese Ed.D students was surveyed using validated scales for mentor support, research self-efficacy, learning engagement, and research creativity. Results: The findings indicate that mentor support is significantly positively correlated with the research creativity of Ed.D students; research self-efficacy and learning engagement serve as mediators in the relationship between mentor support and research creativity. Moreover, the average scores for Ed.D students' research self-efficacy and learning engagement are comparatively low, with male students reporting higher levels of research self-efficacy and research creativity on average. Discussion: These results provide empirical support and practical recommendations for enhancing the research ability of Ed.D students.

Indexed as

doctor of educationlearning engagementmentor supportresearch creativityresearch self-efficacy

Identifiers

PMID40636041
PMCPMC12239143

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.