Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40636015›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in plant science2025

"Cyclic nucleotides in plants: from obscure messengers to central regulators".

Brygida Świeżawska-Boniecka, Adriana Szmidt-Jaworska

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in plant science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Brygida Świeżawska-BonieckaDepartment of Plant Physiology and Biotechnology, Faculty of Biological and Veterinary Sciences, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Toruń, Poland.
Adriana Szmidt-JaworskaDepartment of Plant Physiology and Biotechnology, Faculty of Biological and Veterinary Sciences, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Toruń, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review examines the historical trajectory of cyclic nucleotides (cNMPs) research in plants, a field that has encountered prolonged challenges and skepticism, contrasting sharply with its rapid validation in animal systems. For decades, efforts to detect cyclic nucleotides, specifically cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) and cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP), in plant tissues and to elucidate their functional roles were inconclusive. These challenges primarily stemmed from the extremely low endogenous concentrations of cNMPs in plant cells, the rapid turnover of these molecules, and the limited sensitivity and specificity of early analytical techniques. However, since the 1970s, significant advances in analytical methodologies and bioinformatics have enabled precise quantification of cNMP levels and the bioinformatics identification of enzymes central to plant cNMP signaling pathways. In this review, we trace the key milestones and transformative discoveries that have shaped the evolving landscape of cyclic nucleotide research in plants, highlighting how each step forward has deepened our understanding of cAMP and cGMP as integral regulators of plant physiology.

Indexed as

adenylyl cyclasecyclic AMPcyclic GMPguanylyl cyclaseplant signaling

Identifiers

PMID40636015
PMCPMC12237933

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.