ArticleReports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology2025
Assessment of the exposure to ionizing radiation of the Nuclear Medicine Department in the Greater Poland Cancer Centre in years 2008-2023.
Article in Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The aim of the study was to analyze the individual doses received by the staff of the Nuclear Medicine Department at the Greater Poland Cancer Centre, with a special focus on differences between groups and changes in dose values over time. Materials and methods: The analysis was performed based on radiation exposure doses from the reports of accredited laboratory received by the Nuclear Medicine Department personnel in the Greater Poland Cancer Centre between 2008-2023. The nuclear medicine staff was divided into 5 groups: nurses, medical secretaries, nuclear medicine physicians, cleaning personnel and nuclear medicine radiographers further divided into two subgroups: those preparing radiopharmaceuticals and performing examinations (Group A) and those who perform only examinations (Group B). Results: It was found that personnel who had contact with radioisotopes, i.e., the nurses and radiographers who prepare the radiopharmaceuticals, received higher doses than other employees. However, despite the increase, all employees of the Department receive doses below the limits resulting from the legal regulation. Conclusion: In this study we found that nurses and radiographers handling radiopharmaceuticals receive higher radiation doses than other employees. The study advocates for further research into advanced protective measures and technologies to enhance safety in nuclear medicine practices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.