ArticleReports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology2025
Clinicopathological analysis of the absence of seminal vesicle invasion in prostate cancer patients without radiological evidence on magnetic resonance imaging.
Article in Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: In definitive radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer, the seminal vesicle is included in the target volume for intermediate- and high-risk cases, though this increases the risk of toxicity to the bowel and rectum. This study retrospectively examined clinicopathological data to assess the absence of seminal vesicle invasion (SVI) in prostate cancer patients without radiological evidence of SVI using preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Materials and methods: Patients with cT1c-cT3a prostate cancer who underwent radical prostatectomy between March 2010 and February 2024 were retrospectively selected, excluding those with distant metastasis, missing MRI data, preoperative systemic therapy, or delayed surgery post-biopsy. Preoperative risk factors [age, initial prostate-specific antigen (PSA), grade group (GG), clinical T stage, positive core ratio] and postoperative pathology were analyzed to assess SVI risk. The impact of GG changes between biopsy and postoperative pathology on risk classification and SVI treatment intensity in radiotherapy was also examined. Results: Of 368 patients, 308 met the inclusion criteria. SVI was observed in 26 patients (8.4%). Significant predictors of SVI included GG, initial PSA ≥ 8.6, and positive core ratio, with a positive core ratio < 0.5 and GG ≤ 3 indicating an SVI risk under 10%. GG discrepancies between biopsy and surgery were noted in 182 cases (59.1%), but had minimal impact on risk classification and SVI risk. Conclusions: Patients with a positive core ratio <0.5 had a low risk of SVI. GG discrepancies did not significantly underestimate prostate cancer risk, minimizing the risk of failing to treat true SVI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.