Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40635980›Full record

ArticleReports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology2025

Re-irradiation in head and neck cancer: thirteen years of insights.

Gerim Prasai, Parveen Ahlawat, Sarthak Tandon, Sauharda Lohani, Shaifali Mahajan, Akash R Bellige, Vibhor Patodi, Apoorva Nayak, Azhar Mohammed Ansari, Harsh Vyas and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Transcriptome-based model for predicting radiotherapy response in HNSCC patients.Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Gerim PrasaiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Centre, New Delhi, India.
Parveen AhlawatDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Centre, New Delhi, India.
Sarthak TandonDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Centre, New Delhi, India.
Sauharda LohaniDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Centre, New Delhi, India.
Shaifali MahajanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Centre, New Delhi, India.
Akash R BelligeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Centre, New Delhi, India.
Vibhor PatodiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Centre, New Delhi, India.
Apoorva NayakDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Centre, New Delhi, India.
Azhar Mohammed AnsariDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Centre, New Delhi, India.
Harsh VyasDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Centre, New Delhi, India.
Munish GairolaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Centre, New Delhi, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: This study evaluates the long-term outcomes of re-irradiation (Re-RT) using intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in patients with locally recurrent or second primary (SP) head and neck cancer (HNC). We aimed to assess locoregional control (LRC), overall survival (OS), and toxicity profiles over a 13-year period, identifying factors influencing treatment outcomes. Materials and methods: We retrospectively analyzed records of 178 patients who underwent Re-RT with IMRT at our institution between January 2010 and October 2023. Re-RT was delivered as adjuvant or definitive treatment. Inclusion criteria included squamous cell carcinoma histology and a performance status of ≥ 2. Patients with unresectable clinical T3/T4 or node-positive disease received concurrent chemotherapy. Primary endpoints were LRC and OS, analyzed using univariate and multivariate Cox regression models. Late toxicity was assessed with a focus on functional outcomes and serious late adverse events. Results: The median follow-up was 39.7 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 32.651-46.277]. The median LRC was 11.23 months (95% CI: 6.845-15.627), with a 3-year LRC rate of 21.9%. The median OS was 26.5 months (95% CI: 21.099-31.411), with a 3-year OS rate of 31.7%. Better LRC was associated with a time interval of > 2 years between RT courses and absence of nodal involvement. Improved OS was associated with adjuvant Re-RT and a time interval of ≥ 2 years. Toxicity analysis revealed manageable late toxicities. Conclusion: Re-irradiation with IMRT is effective for locally recurrent or SP HNC, offering promising survival outcomes with manageable toxicity. Proper patient selection and time intervals between RT courses are critical to optimizing outcomes.

Indexed as

head and neck cancerrecurrentre-irradiation

Identifiers

PMID40635980
PMCPMC12236764

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.