Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40635977›Full record

ReviewClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2025

Prevalence of Refractive Errors Among School-Age Children and Adolescents in Saudi Arabia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Abdulmajeed Al Khathami, Mohamed Baklola, Anwar Ali Alshehri, Lujain Hussain Alnasser, Razan Saleh Alshehri, Mohammed A Salawi, Rahaf Hussain Alwadai, Mohammed Al Ghazwi, Amira Ahmed Qadim Alanazi, Asayel Mojidea Alshammari and 3 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Abdulmajeed Al Khathami *Department of Ophthalmology, King Fahad Hospital, Al Baha Health Cluster, Al Baha, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0001-6725-5532
Mohamed Baklola *Faculty of Medicine, Mansour University, Mansoura, Egypt.
Anwar Ali AlshehriCollege of Medicine, University of Bisha, Bisha, Saudi Arabia.
Lujain Hussain AlnasserCollege of Medicine, University of Hail, Hail, Saudi Arabia.
Razan Saleh AlshehriImam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, College of Medicine, Dammam, Saudi Arabia.
Mohammed A SalawiCollege of Medicine, Taif University, Taif, Saudi Arabia.
Rahaf Hussain AlwadaiCollege of Medicine, Najran University, Najran, Saudi Arabia.
Mohammed Al GhazwiBatterjee Medicine college, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Amira Ahmed Qadim AlanaziCollege of Medicine, Northern Border University, Arar, Saudi Arabia.
Asayel Mojidea AlshammariCollege of Medicine, Aljouf University, Aljouf, Saudi Arabia.
Naji Al-Bawah *Faculty of Medicine, Sana'a University, Sana'a, Yemen.
Mayas HafezQatif Central Hospital, Al Qatif, 32654, Saudi Arabia.
Abdullah Abu MelhaDepartment of Ophthalmology, King Fahad Hospital, Al Baha Health Cluster, Al Baha, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Refractive errors, including myopia, hyperopia, and astigmatism, are a leading cause of visual impairment among children worldwide. In Saudi Arabia, the prevalence of these conditions among school-age children and adolescents remains poorly understood, with significant variations reported across studies. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to provide a comprehensive estimate of the pooled prevalence of refractive errors in this population and explored factors influencing their distribution. Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and ScienceDirect was conducted in accordance with PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Observational studies reporting the prevalence of refractive errors among Saudi school-aged children and adolescents were included. Data extraction and quality assessment were conducted using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Pooled prevalence estimates with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using a random-effects model, and heterogeneity was assessed with the I² statistic. Results: Nine studies including over 15,000 participants were analyzed. The pooled prevalence of myopia was 6.7% (95% CI: 3.0% to 14.2%), hyperopia was 3.6% (95% CI: 1.3% to 9.8%), and astigmatism was 7.7% (95% CI: 2.5% to 20.9%). Subgroup analysis revealed regional disparities, with the highest myopia prevalence reported in Taif (33.3%) and Bisha (22.5%), and the lowest in Medina (1.6%). Studies conducted after 2018 showed a significantly higher pooled myopia prevalence (16.4%, 95% CI: 8% to 30.5%) compared to those published before 2018 (3.3%, 95% CI: 1.4% to 7.5%) (p < 0.001). While studies using cycloplegic refraction reported a slightly higher myopia prevalence (7.2%, 95% CI: 4.7% to 11%) than those using non-cycloplegic methods (6.7%, 95% CI: 2.4% to 17.5%), the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.9). No significant difference was observed between studies with smaller or larger sample sizes, although high heterogeneity persisted across all subgroups. Conclusion: Refractive errors, particularly astigmatism, represent a significant and growing public health issue among Saudi school-aged children and adolescents. The findings underscore the urgent need for standardized diagnostic protocols, including the use of cycloplegic refraction, and the implementation of school-based vision screening programs.

Indexed as

astigmatismchildrenhyperopiamyopiarefractive errors

Identifiers

PMID40635977
PMCPMC12239900

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.