ReviewEuropean clinical respiratory journal2025
Integration of rehabilitation and palliation for people with severe lung disease or heart failure - a scoping review.
Review in European clinical respiratory journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Traditionally, rehabilitation and palliative care are delivered as separate services, where rehabilitation focuses on regaining physical functions and palliative care on symptom relief and existential support. There is growing recognition of the potential benefit in integrating these approaches. This scoping review explores how integration or coordination of rehabilitation and palliative care is described in the literature, with a focus on heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and interstitial lung disease. A systematic search was conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CINAHL, identifying 20 relevant publications. Six overarching themes emerged: overlapping treatment goals; timing of services; inclusion of advance care planning (ACP); attention to existential and spiritual dimensions; barriers to integration; and the role of informal caregivers. The majority of the included studies were re-views or expert statements, with few interventional studies. Practical implementation remains limited and poorly defined. While guidelines increasingly support integrated care models, significant challenges persist, including lack of conceptual clarity, limited evidence of effect, and unclear roles for caregivers. There is broad consensus that integration could improve quality of life for both patients and caregivers by combining the functional focus of rehabilitation with palliative symptom management and its holistic approach. While publications support this integration, its implementation in clinical practice remains unclear. A key argument for integration is the overlap in treatment goals and the potential synergy between the two approaches. Several studies highlight the opportunity to incorporate end-of-life discussions, such as ACP, into traditional rehabilitation programs. Introducing palliative care principles earlier in rehabilitation may also increase the number of patients receiving appropriate end-of-life care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.