ArticleJournal of orthopaedic case reports2025
Comparative Evaluation of Functional Outcomes Following Surgical and Conservative Management of Distal Tibia Shaft Fractures: A Prospective Observational Study.
Article in Journal of orthopaedic case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Staged screw removal in external plate fixation for distal tibial fractures: a finite element study on adaptive biomechanics.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Distal tibia shaft fractures pose significant treatment challenges due to limited soft tissue coverage and suboptimal vascularity in the region. Selecting the most appropriate management strategy - whether surgical or conservative - remains a subject of ongoing debate, particularly in resource-limited settings. Materials and Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted at a tertiary care center in central India between October 2022 and April 2024, involving 70 skeletally mature patients with distal tibial shaft fractures. Patients were managed either conservatively or through surgical interventions, including intramedullary nailing (IMN), minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO), or external fixation. Clinical outcomes were assessed at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months post-treatment using the Modified Johner and Wruhs criteria. Radiological union, weight-bearing progression, pain severity, and complication rates were also evaluated. Results: The majority of patients (92.9%) underwent surgical treatment, with IMN being the most frequently used modality (46.2%), followed by MIPO (30.8%) and external fixation (23%). Conservative management was employed in 7.1% of cases. At the 12-month follow-up, full weight-bearing was achieved in 83.3% of IMN, 80% of MIPO, and a variable proportion of external fixation patients. Radiological union with more than three cortices was observed in 90% of IMN and 75% of MIPO patients by 12 months. Overall, excellent-to-good functional outcomes were achieved in 78.6% of cases. Superficial and deep infections, as well as non-union, were more common with external fixation. Conclusion: IMN and MIPO demonstrated superior functional and radiological outcomes compared to external fixation and conservative methods. IMN, in particular, provided faster recovery with fewer complications, making it the preferred modality in appropriately selected cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.